Polyamory
Polyamory means more than one romantic relationship at a time, with everyone's knowledge and consent. The word dates from 1990 to 1992. In a 2021 study of 3,438 single US adults, 10.7% had engaged in it at some point. Research compares primary and secondary partners, and since 2020 a few US cities and towns have recognized multi-partner domestic partnerships.
- Means
- More than one romantic relationship at a time, with everyone's knowledge
- First seen
- 'Poly-amorous' in Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart's 'A Bouquet of Lovers', Green Egg, Beltane (May) 1990, reportedly without the noun; 'polyamory' proposed for the Usenet group alt.polyamory, founded by Jennifer Wesp on May 29, 1992; added to the OED in 2006 according to a 2007 report; Merriam-Webster dates it to 1992
- Related terms
- ENM (ethical non-monogamy), Open relationship, Casual dating, DTR (define the relationship), Situationship
- In Swedish
- Polyamori
Polyamory is having more than one romantic relationship at a time, with everyone involved knowing about the others. The noun is about 34 years old. A Usenet group proposed it in 1992, two years after a magazine article reportedly used the hyphenated form “poly-amorous”. The rest of this page covers where the word comes from, what the studies compared, how many people say they do it, and which US cities have written it into local law.
What is polyamory? Meaning, and where the word comes from
The Usenet group where the word took hold defined it in its FAQ: “Polyamory means ‘loving more than one’. This love may be sexual, emotional, spiritual, or any combination thereof, according to the desires and agreements of the individuals involved” (alt.polyamory FAQ, 1997).
| Date | What happened | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Beltane (May) 1990 | Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart’s article “A Bouquet of Lovers” in Green Egg reportedly uses the hyphenated “poly-amorous” without the noun | Poly in the Media, 2007 |
| May 29, 1992 | “Alt.polyamory was founded by Jennifer Wesp on May 29, 1992.” | alt.polyamory FAQ, 1997 |
| 1992 | Merriam-Webster also dates the word to 1992 | Merriam-Webster; the entry is quoted on our ENM page |
| September 14, 2006 | The Oxford English Dictionary adds polyamory, polyamorous and polyamorist, with citations from 1992 to 2005 starting with Wesp’s May 1992 Usenet proposal, according to a 2007 report on the entry | Poly in the Media, 2007 |
Merriam-Webster and, per the 2007 report above, the OED both credit 1992. Researchers file polyamory under consensual non-monogamy, or CNM, the research name for what dating profiles call ENM.
Polyamory vs open relationship, ENM and polygamy
An open relationship usually opens sex: one couple stays the couple and agrees that sex with others is allowed. Polyamory opens love, meaning more than one relationship that matters, with everyone aware of the others. Our rule of thumb, borrowed from the open-relationship page: count the relationships that matter to the people in them. One couple with agreed outside sex is an open relationship; a second relationship that matters to someone is nearer polyamory.
ENM, ethical non-monogamy, is the umbrella over both, and over swinging and relationship anarchy too; the types of ENM table sets them side by side.
Polygamy is about marriage, polyamory about relationships. The city ordinances further down create domestic partnerships and rules against discrimination, not marriages. In Massachusetts, where the earliest of them passed, state law says that, apart from the exceptions it lists, a marriage contracted while either party “has a former wife or husband living” “shall be void” (Massachusetts General Laws, c. 207, s. 4).
On The Student Room, a UK student forum, a thread titled “Explaining polyamory and bisexuality to people” was started on June 20, 2025 and has about 21 replies. Its opening poster asked: “I mean, why polyamory immediately means an open relationship? It doesn’t have to be and it better not be” (The Student Room, June 2025). On Mumsnet, a British parenting forum, a “Polyamory” thread in the chat section was started on October 6, 2018 and has about 12 replies. A reply told the poster: “That’s ‘open relationship’ territory. Polyamory is more usually used when you have a multiway relationship as a group of three or more” (Mumsnet, October 2018).
How polyamory works: hierarchical, kitchen-table, solo poly and other terms
Polyamorous people have built a vocabulary for who ranks where and who meets whom. The last column gives the earliest dated source we found; where we found none, the definition is ours.
| Term | What it means | Earliest source we found |
|---|---|---|
| Primary and secondary; hierarchical | A primary partner typically shares a household and finances; other partners are secondary. Hierarchical polyamory ranks one relationship first | Balzarini et al., 2017, as a research definition |
| Co-primary and non-primary; non-hierarchical | More than one primary partner, or no partner ranked first | Balzarini et al., 2019, in research use |
| Metamour | Your partner’s partner, from meta- plus amour | An alt.polyamory post, August 11, 2000, per Wiktionary |
| Polycule | Everyone linked by a set of polyamorous relationships, from polyamory plus molecule | Veaux and Rickert, More Than Two, 2014, per Wiktionary |
| Compersion | A warm feeling at seeing a partner happy with someone else | Attributed to the Kerista commune; earliest quotation 1992, in Ayala Malach Pines’s Romantic Jealousy, per Wiktionary |
| Polyfidelity | A closed group whose members are partners only within the group | Coined at the Kerista commune in San Francisco (active 1971 to 1991), by the commune’s own account; we found no year |
| Kitchen-table | Partners and metamours know each other and can sit at the same table | Our definition; we found no dated origin |
| Parallel | Each relationship runs on its own, and metamours rarely or never meet | Our definition; we found no dated origin |
| Solo polyamory (solo poly) | Being polyamorous without a nesting or primary partner | Our definition; we found no dated source |
| Triad or throuple | Three people who are all partners with one another | Our definition |
| NRE | New relationship energy, the rush early in a new relationship | Our definition |
| Relationship anarchy | No relationship ranked above another by default | Andie Nordgren’s manifesto, first published in Swedish in 2006 |
Balzarini and colleagues defined a primary relationship as one “between two partners who typically share a household (live together) and finances, who are married (if marriage is desired), and/or who have or are raising children together (if children are desired)”. In their convenience sample of 1,308 self-identified polyamorous people, recruited online from December 2012 to January 2013, 72.21% shared a household with a primary partner and almost none with a secondary (Balzarini et al., 2017). Our reading of the table above: most of these terms describe who knows whom and who lives with whom.
How many people are polyamorous?
The figures here are about polyamory, apart from two YouGov 2025 items that merge it with open relationships (explained below the table). They measure different things: having done it, wanting to, knowing someone who has, and calling it wrong.
| What it measures | Figure | Who, N, when |
|---|---|---|
| Desire | 16.8% desire to engage in polyamory | 3,438 single US adults, census-based quota sample, published March 23, 2021 (Moors et al., 2021) |
| Ever | 10.7% have engaged in polyamory at some point | Same sample |
| Know someone | 6.5% knew someone who has been or is in polyamory | Same sample |
| Respect | 14.2% of those not interested themselves said they respect people who engage in it | Same sample |
| Ever | 9% had been in “a polyamorous or open relationship” | 1,125 US adult citizens, YouGov opt-in panel, April 18 to 21, 2025 (YouGov, 2025) |
| Would consider | 14% would definitely (4%) or probably (10%) consider an open or polyamorous relationship | Same poll |
| Morally wrong | 51% morally wrong, 20% morally acceptable, 29% not sure | Same poll |
| Not morally acceptable | 56% reject the idea that it is morally acceptable; one quarter say it is | Americans, YouGov, August 12, 2015; YouGov did not print the sample in the article |
| Morally wrong | 47% say polyamory is morally wrong | UK, YouGov UK, July 31, 2015; YouGov did not print the sample in the article |
| Share of polyamorous participants in non-hierarchical setups | About 38% (2013) and 55% (2017) in co-primary or non-primary configurations | Polyamorous participants, online convenience samples, N not stated in the abstract; not a prevalence figure (Balzarini et al., 2019) |
The 2021 figures come from single adults, while YouGov’s 2025 poll was not limited to singles. YouGov also merged polyamorous and open relationships into one item for both the “ever” and the “would consider” questions, so its 9% is an upper limit for polyamory alone in that sample.
Both US morality polls in the table found disapproval the larger answer. The UK one, the only UK figure we found, defines the word by sex: “there is a large group (47%) who even say that polyamory (having multiple consensual sexual relationships at once) is morally wrong” (YouGov UK, 2015). That gloss sits nearer what this page calls an open relationship.
We found no UK prevalence figure, and no Canadian national one: Statistics Canada did not track polyamory as of 2017 (Vanier Institute, 2017). Wider ENM numbers are tabled under how common ENM is.
One app figure, labeled as company data: Feeld added Constellation on June 20, 2024, letting members “link their profiles with up to 5 other partners”. The same release claimed “a staggering 966% growth in Members who express polyamory or ethical non-monogamy as a desire” since its 2017 Paired Partner feature; that is Feeld’s own figure, and it gives no base (Feeld, 2024). More on the app is on our Feeld page.
Is polyamory healthy? What research says about primary and secondary partners
We found no study that answers this for any one person. The studies below mostly used convenience samples, people who chose to take an online survey.
In the 2017 study of 1,308 by Balzarini and colleagues, “Participants reported less stigma as well as more investment, satisfaction, commitment and greater communication about the relationship with primary compared to secondary relationships, but a greater proportion of time on sexual activity with secondary compared to primary relationships.” Primary relationships had lasted 8 years and 4 months on average, secondary ones 2 years and 4 months (Balzarini et al., 2017). Our reading: the secondary relationships were also much newer, and averages alone cannot tell rank apart from relationship length.
In a study published online in December 2015, Mogilski and colleagues compared 123 people in monogamous relationships with 76 in CNM ones. The CNM participants “reported higher overall relationship satisfaction with primary compared to secondary partners and considered their primary partner to be more desirable as a long-term mate than their secondary partner.” The monogamous group “performed more mate retention behaviors”, the study’s term; in plain words, efforts to keep a partner (Mogilski et al., 2017).
A 2019 study led by Mogilski, with 529 monogamous and 159 CNM participants, “replicated previous research showing that monogamous individuals mate guard more than CNM individuals, who mate guard their primary versus secondary partner more frequently.” Compersion appears in the study’s title, not in the lines we quote (Mogilski et al., 2019).
Conley and colleagues, in 2018, looked at sexual satisfaction. The abstract says “monogamous people reported slightly lower sexual satisfaction and lower orgasm rates than those who are CNM”, then: “swingers consistently reported higher sexual satisfaction than monogamous individuals, whereas those in open relationships had equivalent levels of satisfaction to those in monogamous relationships. Relationship satisfaction did not differ between CNM and monogamous groups.” The abstract does not single out polyamorous people as a group of their own (Conley et al., 2018).
A 2015 review by Rubel and Bogaert summed up the research so far: “General trends in the research reviewed suggest that consensual nonmonogamists have similar psychological well-being and relationship quality as monogamists” (Rubel & Bogaert, 2015). Similar, on the measures used, is as far as that goes.
Research on the agreements partners make, by Hoff and colleagues and by Vilkin and Davila, is on the open-relationship page.
Is polyamory legal? Domestic partnerships and city laws in the US
None of the laws below is about marriage. Since 2020, a few Massachusetts municipalities have recognized domestic partnerships of more than two people, and cities including Oakland and Portland have banned discrimination based on family or relationship structure. Rows marked “reported” are ones we could confirm only secondhand.
| Date | City | What it does | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 25, 2020 | Somerville, MA | City council unanimously approved recognizing domestic partnerships, “including those involving more than two people” | Reported by The Somerville Times, July 8, 2020 |
| March 8, 2021 | Cambridge, MA | Council voted to amend the domestic partnership chapter; a partnership is now “the entity formed by two or more persons” who meet listed criteria | City of Cambridge (City Solicitor), December 29, 2022 |
| April 28, 2021 | Arlington, MA (town) | Town Meeting amended the domestic-partnership bylaw to “two or more”; the Massachusetts Attorney General approved it on December 23, 2021 | Reported by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, via The Daily Record, January 7, 2022 |
| March 23, 2023 | Somerville, MA | Bans discrimination based on family and relationship structure | Reported by the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (PLAC), March 24, 2023 |
| November 2023 | Cambridge, MA | Ordinance No. 2023-8B adds “family structure” and “relationship status” to the Human Rights and Fair Housing ordinances | PLAC, November 20, 2023; City of Cambridge |
| April 16, 2024 | Oakland, CA | Bans discrimination “in areas such as housing, business establishments and public services on the basis of family or relationship structure” | Reported by PLAC, April 17, 2024 |
| May 21, 2024 | Berkeley, CA | Ordinance 7,905-N.S. adds Chapter 13.22 on discrimination based on family or relationship structure; in effect from January 1, 2025 | City of Berkeley council item for the May 7, 2024 first reading |
| February 2026 | Olympia, WA | Two ordinances passed unanimously: Ordinance 7462, a new Code Against Discrimination (Chapter 7.01), and an amendment to the unfair housing chapter; the vote date of February 24 is reported in local coverage we could not open | Reported by KNKX, March 12, 2026 |
| March 11, 2026 | Portland, OR | Ordinance 192153 adds family or relationship structure, including “consensually nonmonogamous relationships”, to the Civil Rights Code for employment, real property and public accommodation; in effect April 10, 2026 | City of Portland |
| March 16, 2026 | West Hollywood, CA | Ordinance No. 26-06 adds Chapter 9.46, banning discrimination on the basis of family or relationship structure; adopted on that date according to the council agenda | City of West Hollywood council agenda |
| June 2026 | Hazel Park, MI | Anti-discrimination protection covering family or relationship structure, passed unanimously | Reported by MLive, June 12, 2026, reprinted in The Daily Gazette |
| September 15, 2026 | Seattle, WA | Council unanimously added “family and relationship structure” to the civil rights code; in effect June 1, 2027 | Reported by KIRO Newsradio, September 20, 2026; The Advocate previewed the vote on September 10; the city’s record was not readable to us |
Several of the sources are press releases from PLAC, a project of the Chosen Family Law Center and Harvard Law School’s LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic, by its own description (PLAC, 2023). The Massachusetts Attorney General’s decision approving Arlington’s bylaw in December 2021 said it does not redefine marriage and that “polygamy is illegal in the Commonwealth” (reported by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly via The Daily Record, 2022).
On Mumsnet, a thread titled “Polyamorous / Ethically Non-Monogamous Parents” was started on December 26, 2018 and has about 104 replies. The opening poster, on December 27, 2018, drew the line between the two: “Polyamory and polygamy are two very different things: polyam is having more than one partner in an ethically non-monogamous set up” (Mumsnet, December 2018).
The table covers the US only. We found nothing comparable in the UK or Sweden.
Not legal advice. Checked October 6, 2026.
Common questions
What is the difference between polyamory and polygamy?
Polygamy is being married to more than one person. Polyamory is more than one romantic relationship at a time, married or not, with everyone involved knowing. The US local laws on polyamory create domestic partnerships, not marriages. Massachusetts law voids a marriage contracted while either party "has a former wife or husband living", with exceptions, and the Attorney General's office wrote in 2021, as reported by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, that "polygamy is illegal in the Commonwealth".
Can polyamorous people get married?
To one person, yes. Massachusetts, for example, defines marriage as "the voluntary union of two persons as spouses, to the exclusion of all others", as quoted in the Attorney General's 2021 decision on Arlington's domestic-partnership bylaw, according to Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. What some US municipalities have offered since 2020 is a domestic partnership of more than two people: Somerville, Cambridge and the town of Arlington, all in Massachusetts. That is a local registration, not a marriage.
Is polyamory the same as an open relationship?
No, though the two get mixed up. An open relationship usually opens sex: a couple stays the couple and agrees that sex with other people is allowed. Polyamory opens love, meaning more than one relationship that matters, with everyone aware of the others. Both sit under ENM, ethical non-monogamy. Our rule of thumb: count the relationships. One couple with agreed outside sex is an open relationship; a second relationship that matters to someone is nearer polyamory.
Is polyamory cheating?
By the definition on this page, no: everyone involved knows and has agreed, and that consent is what separates the two. It can still include cheating, such as hiding a new partner or breaking a rule the partners set. The alt.polyamory FAQ, last updated in 1997, already tied polyamory to "the desires and agreements of the individuals involved." Cheating inside a non-monogamous arrangement, and what the research says about it, is on our page about what counts as cheating.
Why do men want polyamory?
We found no study that explains a motive for polyamory by gender. What we have is attitude data. In YouGov's poll of 1,125 US adult citizens (opt-in panel), April 18 to 21, 2025, 14% said they would definitely or probably consider an open or polyamorous relationship, 20% of men and 9% of women. The item merges open and polyamorous, and it shows who says they would consider it, not who wants or practices it.
Sources
- alt.polyamory Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), version 2.3.1a, alt.polyamory (Usenet FAQ), 1997-06-10
- polyamory, Merriam-Webster, undated, accessed 2026-10-06
- "Polyamory" enters the Oxford English Dictionary, and tracking the word's origins, Poly in the Media (blog), 2007-01-06
- General Laws, Part II, Title III, Chapter 207, Section 4, Massachusetts Legislature, undated, accessed 2026-10-06
- Explaining polyamory and bisexuality to people, The Student Room, 2025-06-20
- Polyamory, Mumsnet (Chat), 2018-10-06
- metamour, Wiktionary, undated, accessed 2026-10-06
- polycule, Wiktionary, undated, accessed 2026-10-06
- compersion, Wiktionary, undated, accessed 2026-10-06
- Eve's Polyfidelity Article (Kerista.commune, The Historical Record), Kerista (kerista.com), undated, accessed 2026-10-06
- The short instructional manifesto for relationship anarchy (Andie Nordgren), The Anarchist Library (first published by Interacting Arts), 2006
- Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory (Balzarini, Campbell, Kohut, Holmes, Lehmiller, Harman & Atkins), PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0177841, 2017-05-18
- Comparing Relationship Quality Across Different Types of Romantic Partners in Polyamorous and Monogamous Relationships (Balzarini, Dharma, Kohut, Campbell, Lehmiller, Harman & Holmes), Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 1749-1767, 2019
- Desire, Familiarity, and Engagement in Polyamory: Results From a National Sample of Single Adults in the United States (Moors, Gesselman & Garcia), Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 619640, 2021-03-23
- Half of Americans say they've been cheated on; one-third say they've been the cheater (Jamie Ballard), YouGov, 2025-05-20
- Relationships poll results (April 18-21, 2025; 1,125 US adult citizens; opt-in panel), YouGov, 2025-05-20
- Polyamory: taboo for religious Americans but not for the rest (Peter Moore), YouGov, 2015-08-12
- Women tend to think humans are naturally monogamous. Men don't (Will Dahlgreen), YouGov UK, 2015-07-31
- Polyamory in Canada: Research on an Emerging Family Structure (John-Paul Boyd), The Vanier Institute of the Family, 2017-04-11
- Monogamy versus Consensual Non-Monogamy: Alternative Approaches to Pursuing a Strategically Pluralistic Mating Strategy (Mogilski, Memering, Welling & Shackelford), Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 407-417, 2017
- Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships (Mogilski, Reeve, Nicolas, Donaldson, Mitchell & Welling), Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(6), 1811-1828, 2019
- Sexual satisfaction among individuals in monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships (Conley, Piemonte, Gusakova & Rubin), Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(4), 509-531, 2018-03-23
- Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Quality Correlates (Rubel & Bogaert), Journal of Sex Research, 52(9), 961-982, 2015
- City approves polyamorous domestic relationship recognition (Jim Clark), The Somerville Times, 2020-07-08
- City Solicitor opinion on domestic partnership website language, City of Cambridge (City Solicitor), 2022-12-29
- AG upholds town's recognition of 'polyamorous' relationships, The Daily Record (Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly), 2022-01-07
- Somerville Passes Historic Non-Discrimination Ordinance Protecting Polyamorous Families and Other Diverse Relationships, Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (press release), 2023-03-24
- Diverse Families Rejoice; Cambridge City Council Passes Historic Nondiscrimination Law, Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (press release), 2023-11-20
- Cambridge Expands Legal Protections - Recognizing Every Family, Every Relationship, City of Cambridge (CityView, winter 2026), 2026-03-16
- Oakland Passes Historic Nondiscrimination Bill Protecting Diverse Family and Relationship Structures, Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (press release), 2024-04-17
- Relationship Nondiscrimination Ordinance (Item 41), City of Berkeley (City Council agenda, May 7, 2024), 2024-05-07
- Oly-amory: Olympia becomes first WA city to pass polyamory protections (Nate Sanford), KNKX, 2026-03-12
- Amend Civil Rights Code related to sexual orientation and family status definitions and amend nondiscrimination clauses (Ordinance 192153), City of Portland, 2026-03-11
- Chapter 23.01 Civil Rights, City of Portland (City Code), undated, accessed 2026-10-06
- Item B.8: Adopt Ordinance No. 26-06 (2nd reading), adopting Chapter 9.46 prohibiting discrimination on the basis of family or relationship structure, City of West Hollywood (City Council agenda, March 16, 2026), 2026-03-16
- In a first, polyamorous people get bias protection in this Michigan city (Peg McNichol, MLive, June 12, 2026), The Daily Gazette (reprint), undated, accessed 2026-10-06
- Seattle could soon protect non-monogamous relationships under civil rights law (Mathew Rodriguez), The Advocate, 2026-09-10
- 'How does that work?': Jake puzzles over Seattle's new polyamory protections, KIRO Newsradio (MyNorthwest, opinion), 2026-09-20
- Feeld introduces Constellation, Feeld (press release), 2024-06-20
- Polyamorous / Ethically Non-Monogamous Parents, Mumsnet (Relationships), 2018-12-26